include the background
summary and problem statement from the Preliminary Investigation
Report
The current system functions well in a few areas while many areas suffer from volume slow downs and lack of data. In addition, the inventory component of the distribution system has few controls and remains a constant source of difficulty in the system. A new computerized system with full inventory control is required to solve these problems. Data currently collected, but unavailable to management due to access problems, must be made available through a simple, non-threatening interface. The development of standards and policies is also required as part of the solution and these must be communicated adequately to all staff, permanent and voluntary. A full training plan will be necessary to implement the new system and maximize its opportunity for success.
Specific areas of note in the new system are: the need for automating the application process, computerized inventory control, networking all work areas, volunteer database, and automated reporting. It is recommended that the project proceed to the design stage and that the planning for hardware and software acquisitions proceed immediately to ensure their timely delivery. During the design of the new system it is important that the major strengths of the existing system be incorporated into the design, especially the enthusiasm and dedication of the work force.
background from the Preliminary
Investigation Report
problem statement from
the Preliminary Investigation Report
process flow
Functional Decomposition of Function: Manage Distribution
Note: Each process would be given a numeric designation using the functional decomposition format. For example, 2.4, 3.2.3, 3.1.2.5, etc.
analysis of strengths and
weaknesses
The major strength of the current system is the dedication of the people using the system. However, numerous weaknesses exist in the current system. These include:
be inconsistent
possible solutions and
feasibility
The recommended system would use a packaged database, such as MS Access, with a GUI reporting tool, such as Crystal Reports, on an internal network. This would provide user friendly interfaces with the system and allow quick, efficient access to the data for all purposes in the system. This system would also allow for an interface to other system, most notably the accounting system, in the future.
The recommended system would fall within the budget detailed by management and it is felt that this system would provide satisfactory results when compared to the Terms of Reference for this project.
An alternative system would be to develop three stand-alone applications, one for each area: Application processing, Administration, and Request processing. Each unit would provide operational data for that area alone and interfaces between sub-units would require manual transferring of data. This system would require less equipment and development, thus reducing the project costs considerably. However, the system interfaces would be cumbersome and vexing during high volume situations. This alternative is not recommended.
A third option would be to leave the system as it is with the exception of improving the forms used. The forms could be redesigned to provide multiple copies, collect all required data for the operation, and ease of use. This option is very low cost, however, it is felt that the objectives of the project as designated in the Terms of Reference would be marginally reached, at best. This option is not recommended.
It is recommended that the project proceed to the design phase. The new system should be a computerized system with a graphic user interface implemented on an internal network of IBM compatible computers. The system should include the following areas:
The time frame for this project is expected to be three months and full implementation will follow training and testing. User involvement in the design of this system is imperative if the implementation is to succeed.
context diagram from the
preliminary investigation report would be included
first level data flow diagram

| D1 | Food_Order |
| D2 | Grocer_Invoice |
| D3 | Donation |
| D4 | Accepted_Donation |
| D5 | Received_Food |
| D6 | Filled_Food_Order |
| D7 | Rejected_Request |
| D8 | Rejected_Donation |
| D9 | Food_Request |
| D10 | Sorted_Food |
| D11 | Accepted_Request |
| D12 | Request |
| D13 | Filled_Request |
| D14 | Current_Food_Stock |
| D15 | Unspoiled_Food |
| D16 | Spoiled_Food |
| D17 | Report_Info |
| D18 | Donation_Info |
| P1 | Prepare Food Order |
| P2 | Receive Food Order |
| P3 | Verify Request |
| P4 | Prepare Hamper |
| P5 | Check Food |
| P6 | Generate Report |
| P7 | Check Donation |
| P8 | Sort Food |
| F1 | Rejected File |
| F2 | Food Order File |
| F3 | Food Stock File |
| F4 | Filled Request File |
copies of referenced materials
and any large tables used for reference would be included
summary from the preliminary
investigation report
After consulting with Vance, you may leave or pick up the phone.